Making a Murderer Update 7 - Suspicious Calls

Pic 1 and theory from an anonymous source:

Posted by @0Hour1 who is convinced that Teresa was killed by someone close who forwarded calls on the road:

Click here for Update 3  - Response From Innocence Project


Tags: steven avery, brendan dassey, ken kratz, manitowoc, len kachinsky, robert hermann, teresa halbach, jerry pagel, calumet county, jerome buting, makingamurderer, dean strang, michael o'kelly, mark wiegert, rob herrman, sherry culhane, jerome fox, tom fassbender, manitowoc county sheriff's office, teresa halbach, michael griesbach, the innocent killer  

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

I remember reading or seeing somewhere that the ex had seen her at a party the previous weekend and he said she told him she was meeting family (maybe friends) at a bar on Halloween and that he should go. He said (I think) he called her on 10/31 to see about later that night but never heard back. WHY wouldn't he call in the afternoon and evening to confirm plans? Did he go to the bar without her? If she really was supposed to meet people, why didn't any of them call her when she didn't show up?

Anonymous said...

The blocked caller was identified as SA.

n. said...

Regarding the second image that is preceded by this comment: "Posted by @0Hour1 who is convinced that Teresa was killed by someone close who forwarded calls on the road."

On the image it says "who and where the last call from. Note the length."

I'd just like to point out that the author of the call @0Hour1 is pointing to has already been established: it was Halbach.

According to the Dassey trial transcripts, that 2:41 call was the last one she made. Page 56, here: http://jenniferjslate.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/DasseyTrial_Day9_4.25.07.pdf.

Dani Kekoa said...

BREAKING NEWS: Why Steven Avery deserves a new trial—by Timothy Charles Holmseth
http://stevenavery.org/why-steven-avery-deserves-new-trial

ShadowGov Operation Frames Innocent People-

Unknown said...

Not true. SA called twice while using the code *67 to block his number from coming up on her caller id. The third call he placed to her at 4:35 he didn't use it. However, the caller that Teresa blocked was not SA.

Unknown said...

Not true. SA called twice while using the code *67 to block his number from coming up on her caller id. The third call he placed to her at 4:35 he didn't use it. However, the caller that Teresa blocked was not SA.

Dave said...

Those calls in that red box were from the same location, cause Teresa was still at home or in her area. Steven Schmitz was her first appointment of the day at around 1:30pm. Every call on 10/30(there is another page to her calls) and every call up to call at 12:51 on the 31st were made and routed through the same area. That call at 12:51 on the 31st was to Mr. Schmitz to let him know she was on the way. I will post a link to her activity report that has the calls she made listed, and some incoming ones that were verified by testimony that I labelled. The last call that her phone received was at 2:41, and I believe that she turned her phone off while it was ringing, since it did hit the towers and reach her phone, sending it to CFNA. The first call after that at 4:25 from Steven didn't hit any towers, so her phone was obviously off for good before that time.
http://www.imageno.com/6rkv1wrypqk3pic.html

Anonymous said...

The 11:43 am call that lasted 1:05 was from Scott Tadych's land line.

Unknown said...

To Anonymous: So you are saying Scott Tadych made a call to Teresa at 11:35 am on 10/31?? Hmmm, I didn't hear that before. Detective Weigert also said he called Teresa on 10/31, in a video I see between him and Riemker talking. Why would he have tried to call Teresa, I wonder on that day ??

MelanieMeep said...

Hmm why was Scott calling her? Is there proof/ a link to back this statement up? I suppose as it was Barbs van he would have had reason to but I still have suspicions

MelanieMeep said...

Hmm why was Scott calling her? Is there proof/ a link to back this statement up? I suppose as it was Barbs van he would have had reason to but I still have suspicions

MelanieMeep said...

Hmm why was Scott calling her? Is there proof/ a link to back this statement up? I suppose as it was Barbs van he would have had reason to but I still have suspicions about him and Bobby.

MelanieMeep said...

Hmm why was Scott calling her? Is there proof/ a link to back this statement up? I suppose as it was Barbs van he would have had reason to but I still have suspicions about him and Bobby.

Pete said...

Check out Sherri Coleman murder case...she was harassed the same way, and husband falsely convicted of her murder!