10 Sept 08

Sky News

I'm scheduled to appear live on the main Sky News TV station tonight (7:15pm UK time, 11:15am in Arizona).

Sky News has millions of viewers and can be watched on the Internet:



Thank you for all of the emails of support since the Arizona Department of Corrections tried to sabotage Jon’s Jail Journal by banning prisoners from writing to me. It is my hope that this publicity will help the plight of my friends inside.

This isn't the first time the Arizona Department of Corrections has blocked prisoners from the Internet. I just found this article online:

Arizona was the first and only state to erect a total blockade between its inmate population and the Internet -- and the first state to get trounced in court for trying to keep prisoners offline. The Arizona Legislature was stirred to act on the issue by the anguish and outrage of the widow of a murder victim, who came across a Web page on a pen pal site in which Beau Greene, her husband's killer, portrayed himself as a kindly lover of cats.

The result was a
law enacted in 2000 that threatened to strip privileges and possibly lengthen the prison sentence of any inmate in Arizona who gained access to the Internet by any means, or for that matter, merely "corresponds or attempts to correspond with a communication service provider or remote computing service." It would even be illegal, the law brashly declared, if any other person accessed a prisoner Web service "at the inmate's request."

Prison authorities in Arizona asserted that the law not only protected the rights of victims, it also reduced a security risk and a growing administrative burden.
"Inmates used to have two or three pen pals," a spokesman for the department complained. "Now they can run it up into the hundreds," thanks to the growing number of Web-based pen pal services for prisoners.

The wilier inmates use one of a dozen or more sites such as
Prison Pen Pals or Outlaws Online to garner more than mail, officials added. They coax money out of people on false pretenses and lure them into intense but duplicitous personal relationships.
Numerous lonely hearted women initially drawn in by a Web page have flocked from as far away as Belgium and Australia to Florence, Ariz., and its cluster of prisons, officials said. One of them once went so far as to obtain a gun and vehicle that was used in an escape attempt. While inmates can perpetrate scams through the regular mail, it is much easier via the Internet, the department and its lawyers maintained in defense of the law.

Judge Earl Carroll of the U.S. District Court in Phoenix wasn't buying it. In May 2003 he declared the Arizona law unconstitutional. Abusive Web postings that taunt victims, promote crime or attempt to defraud others can be stopped with existing regulations that prohibit inmates from sending or receiving that sort of material through the regular mail, the judge noted.

David Fathi, senior staff counsel for the
ACLU National Prison Project, represented the plaintiffs in the lawsuit that toppled the Arizona law -- the Canadian coalition, a pen pal Web service and a Los Angeles-based organization called Stop Prisoner Rape.
"We argued that any legitimate interest that the prison system had in keeping inmates off the Internet was already covered by regulating the prisoners' incoming and outgoing mail," Fathi said. "The state doesn't have a legitimate interest in preventing someone from Canada, Sweden or New York from posting material on their Web site."

Besides stopping the occasional abusive posting, the Arizona law shut off Web writing that served an important public purpose, the ACLU noted, citing Stop Prisoner Rape as a case in point. On its Web site, the group, which advocates for changes in the law to address a little-noticed problem, publishes "
survivor stories" written by victims of prison rapes. The group aims to "change public attitudes about sexual assault behind bars and put a human face on the issue instead of allowing it to be trivialized and made into a joke," said Alex Coolman, communications coordinator for the advocacy group.

No other state has followed in Arizona's footsteps and attempted an all-out prohibition on Internet access by inmates. "They have wisely realized that is not constitutionally permissible to prevent free people from putting material on their Web site," Fathi said.

Email comments to writeinside@hotmail.com or post them below


Anonymous said...

I'm recording you tonight so be charming and debonnaire!! BREAK A LEG!


Anonymous said...

Why not go back to all the media outlets you have already dealt with -- the radio and talk shows, write newspaper articles for those who have printed your previous stories. Continue the story for them. Write to the ACLU -- American Civil Liberties Union. You can find their website easy enough.



Anonymous said...

DOC be damned!


Anonymous said...

It's disgraceful that the State of Arizona is violating the law like this especially after the court ruled against them on this exact thing.
What's the ACLU saying?


Sue O. (aka Joannie, SS) said...

I would reference the final paragraph, that no other state has followed in AZ's footsteps due to constitutionality issues. It seems, as usual, a legal cannon is enacted to swat a fly, and the collateral damage is not only illegal, but just plain not worth the effort. I truly feel for the widow in the initial case, but there are other ways to skin a cat, namely-use the freedom of the internet to it's full advantage, which would have been much more costly to the feline-loving pen pal seeker in question. Seriously, what inmate has "hundreds" of pen pals? You don't and this blog has got to the largest and most well-known of any. And any person who engages in a writing relationship with an inmate knows the inherent risks.

adam said...

Good to hear the case is getting some proper publicity. I hope it will catch on. I hope you - and others - will be able to move things.

If there's something a blogger can do to help please post it. I imagine you have a rather large community behind you.



Anonymous said...

Thought they cut you short a bit! Interviewer was a bit of a ******.

Jon said...

He had to cut me short because the program was at a commercial break. I intend to post a video of the interview here later on today and the rest of the answer I was unable to finish.

Shaun Attwood

Anonymous said...

OK, thanks for that.

Anonymous said...

I will be looking out for that. A little bit of noise around this can only help, I hope. People should not be forbidden to communicate directly to loved ones. The mass people always pay for the few that abuse the system (the ones that pursue crime by communicating with the outside.)

Well done to have gotten this interview. Good luck (merde!) = break a leg

Cat Eyes

Anonymous said...

How exciting!!!!! I think Az is 2 hours earlier than Fla, I will try to see if I can listen. Im so excited for you!!!! Youre great!!!
With Love, A

Anonymous said...

[b]cheapest software anyware, [url=http://firgonbares.net/]windows vista ultimate edition[/url]
[url=http://firgonbares.net/][/url] best office software office basic software
software so cheap [url=http://firgonbares.net/]cheap software store[/url] coreldraw x4 key gen
[url=http://firgonbares.net/]best substitute for photoshop using mac intel[/url] free download adobe photoshop cs4
[url=http://firgonbares.net/]nero 9 review[/url] buying oem software
microsoft office 2003 key generator [url=http://firgonbares.net/]WinZip 12 Pro[/b]